Showing posts with label Microsoft. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Microsoft. Show all posts

Tuesday, June 26, 2012

Google (Nasdaq: GOOG) Tablet: Finally Some Competition for Apple’s iPad?

Google (Nasdaq: GOOG) Tablet: Finally Some Competition for Apple’s iPad?Atlanta, GA 6/26/12 (StreetBeat) -- Apple (Nasdaq:AAPL) has cemented its dominance in the tablet market, but that hasn't stopped competitors from trying to chip away at the iPad's market share and fight for the runner up position. The latest entrant, Microsoft's (Nasdaq:MSFT) "Surface," was introduced last week with strong fanfare. But its time in the spotlight may be short-lived as Google (Nasdaq:GOOG) is expected to unveil their own tablet, the Nexus 7during this week's I/O developer's conference.

"For Google this is certainly a big opportunity," says David Garrity of GVA Research, adding that the tech behemoth may be better positioned to beat out Microsoft due to its history across software and hardware, especially after acquiring Motorola Mobility.

"Google I think could potentially have a product that does pose a threat. However, that said, Apple is still the name to beat in terms of the space," says Garrity. He points to Apple's unparalleled momentum and years of brand equity as primary reasons why Google and just about any other competitor will have trouble making significant dent in the tablet market.

As for Microsoft and the aforementioned Surface, Garrity suggests they may not even be competing for the same customers. He predicts the company's foray into hardware (Xbox not withstanding) will put the Surface more in line with Ultrabooks in terms of pricing rather than slightly cheaper tablets. Garrity says Microsoft won't "throw over a business model that has served them reasonably well for about the last 30 years to come out and transform wholly into an integrated provider of hardware and software." Rather, in his view the Surface is a product that will highlight the strengths of Windows 8 and what the platform is capable of.

With Apple, Google, and Microsoft leading the tablet pack, Garrity reminds us not to discount the old guards like Dell (Nasdaq:DELL) and Hewlett Packard (NYSE:HPQ). He argues both have perfectly good reasons to enter the fray, but whether or not they do depends on Microsoft loyalty for Dell and whether Meg Whitman can, or even wants to, succeed in a market that her HP predecessors clearly avoided.

StreetBeat Disclaimer

Distributed by Viestly

Tuesday, June 19, 2012

Microsoft's (Nasdaq: MSFT) long and tortured history in tablets

Microsoft's (Nasdaq: MSFT) long and tortured history in tabletsPalm Beach, FL 6/19/12 (StreetBeat) -- For decades, the tablet computer was like a mirage in the technology industry: a great idea, seemingly reachable on the horizon, that disappointed as hopeful companies got closer. Microsoft (Nasdaq: MSFT) has experienced this cycle of hope and disappointment many times.

The device unveiled by the Redmond Wash.-based software giant on Monday —the Surface— isn't the first tablet it envisioned. Indeed, the company's engineers have been trying to reshape personal computing for as long as there's been a PC.

The first PCs had keyboards, borrowed from the typewriter. But people quickly started wondering whether pens, which are more comfortable writing tools, wouldn't be a better basis for personal computing.

Several companies worked pen-based computing in the late 1980s, and Microsoft jumped on the trend. By 1991, it released "Windows for Pen Computing," an add-on to Windows 3.1 that let the operating system accept input from an active "pen" (really a stylus). Several devices used Microsoft's software, and are recognizable as the ancestors of today's tablets: They were square, portable slabs with a screen on one side. They weren't designed to respond to finger-touches, however: the reigning paradigm was that of the notepad and pen.

The pen-computing fad subsided in the 90s. While PenWindows tablets got a lot of attention, mainstream computing remained stubbornly keyboard-based.

In 2002, Microsoft founder Bill Gates said these early tablet ventures were "almost painful to recall," but not to worry. He had something much better, a device that would fulfill "a dream that I and others have had for years and years," he said. It was Windows for XP Tablet PC Edition. This time, hardware makers like Hewlett-Packard Co. (NYSE: HPQ), Samsung Electronics, Toshiba Corp. (OTCBB: TSYY) and Acer Group played along, producing tablet PCs.

Like the earlier generation, some of these looked like today's tablets, but inside, they were really PCs. Compared to an iPad, they were expensive — at around $1,500 — heavy, and didn't last long on battery power. Buyers paid a lot for the ability to enter things on the screen with a pen.

Another problem was that the pen-based adaptations were skin-deep. Windows remained a thoroughly keyboard-and-mouse-based operating system, and many functions were simply hard to get to with a pen. Third-party applications weren't converted for pen use at all. As a backup, many of these tablets had keyboards, just like laptops.

The tablet PCs found homes in a few business settings, where a PC that could be used while standing, at least for short periods, was welcome. But they remained a niche product, and the number of manufacturers who made tablet PCs steadily shrank.

In parallel with the Tablet PC push, Microsoft prompted partners such as Fujitsu and ViewSonic to create Smart Displays. These were big tablets intended for home use, and each one was linked to a PC through Wi-Fi, making it something of an expensive monitor with short-range portability. This was supposed to be a cheaper alternative to a full-blown tablet, but the devices reached shelves at $1,000 and more in 2003. While a Smart Display was in use, the associated PC could not be used. Very few were sold, and Microsoft cancelled the project the same year.

Microsoft gave tablets another try in 2006, launching "Project Origami" with some of its partners. The idea was to make really small PCs with screens sensitive not just to pens, but to fingers. This time, fewer companies followed along. One of them was Samsung, which had high hopes for its "Q1".

But Microsoft hadn't learned much from its Tablet PC adventure. Windows was still hard to use with anything other than a keyboard. The "Ultra-Mobile PCs" were still expensive and suffered from very short battery life — the Q1 could surf the Web for about 2 hours. One thing they did get right was weight — the Q1 weighed 1.7 pounds, just a bit more than a first-generation iPad.

In 2008, reports emerged of yet another tablet computer, or rather a "booklet computer," being developed by Microsoft. Code-named "Courier," it had two screens joined by a hinge, and facing each other. It was designed for pen and finger input. Microsoft cancelled the project in 2010, saying it was just one of many projects it tests to "foster productivity and creativity."

One touch-based computer that did see the light of day in 2008 was Microsoft Surface. It was more of a table than a tablet: the computer was a big box that sat on a floor, with a big, horizontal screen on top. It was intended not for home use but for store displays and similar applications. Unusually, Microsoft didn't rely on hardware partners for this product, but made and sold it on its own. Intended as a niche product, it has remained one.

Microsoft has had one notable success in the tablet space — if you apply a broad definition to the term. Its "Pocket PC" operating system, which is distinct from Windows, ran on phone-sized hand-held "personal digital assistants" starting around 2000. The devices were powerful compared to Palm's PDAs, the market leaders of their time. The Pocket PCs supported color screens, and could recognize casual handwriting. Compaq made good use of Microsoft's Pocket PC software in its popular iPAQ line. But PDAs were a small market, and when Pocket PC moved over to smartphones and was renamed Windows Mobile, it soon found tough competition in the shape of BlackBerrys and then iPhones.

The company that finally cracked the tablet code in 2010 was Apple, not Microsoft. Apple (Nasdaq: AAPL) made the iPad a success by scaling up a phone rather than scaling down a PC, which is what Microsoft had been trying to do with the Tablet PC and Origami. Phone chips are cheap and last much longer on batteries, which meant that the iPad was both light, inexpensive and had good battery life. In addition, the iPhone software it used was designed from the ground up for touch input.

Microsoft's new strategy is similar. For Windows 8, it's borrowing design features from Windows Phone, its new smartphone system. Most importantly, one version of the software is designed to run on phone-style chips, rather than the PC-style chips that have been the mainstay of Windows since it was created in the 1980s. It remains to be seen whether Microsoft can make its tablet vision a reality, or if it will stay a mirage.

Please contact www.thestreetbeat.com for interest in our latest investor relations platform the “CEO Interview Series” with its host Steve Kanaval. The package includes a one-on-one interview with a seasoned industry professional; published segment to our web site with embedded audio/video file; and a compressed file that can be easily e-mailed out to your current and/or potential investors. Please e-mail bflautt@gmail.com or call (662) 392-0740 for pricing and scheduling.

StreetBeat Disclaimer

Distributed by Viestly

Thursday, March 29, 2012

Red Hat (NYSE: RHT) stock touches 5-year high after quarterly profit beat

Red Hat (NYSE: RHT) stock touches 5-year high after quarterly profit beatNorthern, WI 3/29/12 (StreetBeat) -- Shares of Red Hat Inc (NYSE:RHT) rose to their highest in five years after the business software maker reported a profit that beat analysts' expectations for the fifth straight quarter.

The stock of the world's largest distributor of the Linux operating system was up 14 percent at $58.67 after touching a high of $59.97 earlier in the session.

"Overall we remain bullish on the long-term outlook for Red Hat that includes several new products and realistic long term expectations," analysts at RBC Capital Markets wrote in a note to clients.

Brokerage Credit Agricole said the company is benefiting from the broad migration to cloud-related data center build-outs by enterprise customers, who are looking to build their own private or public clouds.

New products such as the RHEV 3.0 position Red Hat as a strong alternative to VMWare's (NYSE: VMW) or Microsoft's (NASDAQ: MSFT) virtual stack, Credit Agricole said in a note to clients.

The growing migration to cloud computing has been a key driver of revenue growth for Red Hat's Linux server software, as has expanding IT budgets after the recession years.

For the fourth quarter, the company posted billings growth of 31 percent, that outpaced its revenue growth for the fourth time in the past five quarters. It also announced a $300 million share buyback program.

Several analysts raised their price targets on the stock.

Please contact www.thestreetbeat.com for interest in our latest investor relations platform the “CEO Interview Series” with its host Steve Kanaval. The package includes a one-on-one interview with a seasoned industry professional; published segment to our web site with embedded audio/video file; and a compressed file that can be easily e-mailed out to your current and/or potential investors. Please e-mail bflautt@gmail.com or call (662) 392-0740 for pricing and scheduling.

StreetBeat Disclaimer

Distributed by Viestly

Monday, February 13, 2012

Apple's (Nadaq: AAPL) Stock Surges to $500; Market Value Near $500 Billion

Apple's (Nadaq: AAPL) Stock Surges to $500; Market Value Near $500 BillionOrlando, FL 2/13/12 (StreetBeat) – Apple (Nasdaq: AAPL), whose price hit $500 for the first time on Monday, could be the first company ever to reach a trillion dollar valuation.

The tech giant's valuation is now nearly halfway to the 10-figure mark, with speculation Apple will launch iTV later this year driving shares to new record highs. Yet, Apple still has a way to go to become the most valuable company of all time.

Apple shares are up more than 20 percent year to date.
And with its price now around $500, the company's valuation is about $460 billion-roughly $8 billion more than the market caps percent of Google (NASDAQ: GOOG) ($198 billion) and Microsoft (NASDAQ: MSFT) ($257 billion) combined.

If Apple shares continue to hit new record levels, its market cap will reach $500 billion when the price reaches $537. Still, shares will need to rise another $100 above that level to put Apple in contention for the most expensive company ever.

According to Standard and Poor's, ExxonMobil (NYSE: XOM) was the most recent company to see a valuation north of $500 billion, back in 2007 when oil prices were at record highs.

Not surprisingly, it was the Tech Bubble of the last decade that first launched companies into rarified half trillion dollar market valuations levels. Between 1999 and 2000 Intel (Nasdaq: INTC), Cisco (NASDAQ: CSCO) and General Electric (NYSE: GE) all saw their valuations peak at around $500 billion. (GE is a minority shareholder in NBCUniversal)

While Microsoft may not excite investors like it did in Y2K, the software behemoth still holds the record for the most expensive valuation. Its market cap closed out 1999 at just over $600 billion according to Standard and Poor's, before peaking north of $650 billion during the tech bubble in 2000.

The high analyst price target on the street for Apple right now is $700. At that price, its market cap will handily surpass Microsoft's Y2K record.

The Apple TV was one of the last product initiatives spearheaded by Apple co-founder Steve Jobs, before his death. If the entertainment device and platform prove as big a game changer as the company's iTunes, iPhone and iPad, Apple shares could well continue their record run.

With its current float of about 932 million shares outstanding, Apple shares would need to top $1073 to reach the Trillion Dollar mark.

StreetBeat Disclaimer

Distributed by Viestly

Friday, February 10, 2012

Apple's (Nasdaq: AAPL) Gain Is Nuance's (Nasdaq: NUAN) Pain

Apple's (Nasdaq: AAPL) Gain Is Nuance's (Nasdaq: NUAN) PainPalm Beach, FL 2/10/12 (StreetBeat) – Apple (Nasdaq: AAPL) is edging ever closer to $500 a share, but not all of its suppliers are basking in the iPhone maker's glow. Just ask Nuance Communications (Nasdaq: NUAN).

Apple has long been known to drive a hard bargain with its suppliers. The company continually tries to find a way to maximize its own margins, while squeezing those of its partners. Apple products are largely deemed must-haves, and suppliers are willing to do whatever they can to insert their products into the iPhone and iPad.

CEO Tim Cook may continue to drive harder bargains in the future than his predecessor Steve Jobs did, as Cook's experience and intellect are on the operational side of the business.

Nuance Communications reported weaker-than-expected first-quarter earnings as the company said its relationship with mobile companies has become "more comprehensive and complex" lately. Nuance makes part of the technology that goes into Siri, the personal and voice recognition assistant in the iPhone 4S.

This could eventually mean that Apple and other handset makers like Research In Motion (Nasdaq: RIMM) and phones that use Google's (Nasdaq: GOOG) Android operating system may wind up developing their own technology, or potentially moving on to another partner, squeezing Nuance shares even further.

Wedbush Securities analyst Scott Sutherland believes this could eventually happen, as he wrote in a recent earnings note. He believes Apple could eventually build its own automatic speech recognition (ASR), as Google has already done and Microsoft (Nasdaq: MSFT) has done with Kinect.

"...[W]e believe Apple will follow Microsoft's and Google's lead and build its own ASR, especially after Siri's co-founder indicated Nuance ASR could be swapped out," Sutherland wrote in his note. He rates Nuance shares underperform with a $18 price target.

Sutherland also said he believes that the other handset makers Nuance works with could squeeze Nuance even more..

Deutsche Bank analyst Nandan Amladi also suggested that other handset makers may eschew Nuance's products in the future, as they have developed in-house alternatives. Amladi maintained his buy rating and $30 price target on Nuance following the earnings report.

Nuance reported quarterly earnings of 34 cents a share on revenue of $360.6 million, well below what analysts were looking for. Analysts polled by Thomson Reuters expected the company to report earnings of 36 cents a share on $391.6 million in revenue.

StreetBeat Disclaimer

Distributed by Viestly

Wednesday, January 18, 2012

Majesco (Nasdaq: COOL) shares plunge on weak outlook

Majesco (Nasdaq: COOL) shares plunge on weak outlookPalm Beach. FL 1/18/12 (StreetBeat) -- Majesco Entertainment Co's (Nasdaq: COOL) shares fell as much as 30 percent after the video game publisher forecast a weak 2012 as it expects higher selling and marketing costs.

The company expects the costs, primarily related to the launch of its new Zumba title -- Zumba Rush -- for Microsoft's (Nasdaq: MSFT) Xbox 360 Kinect, to grow by about 20 percent this year.

The "Zumba Fitness" game, launched in 2010 and based on motion-sensing technology, has sold more than 6 million copies worldwide and continues to be one of the top-ranked games in the United States and the United Kingdom. It contributes about 70 percent to Majesco's revenue.

Shares of the Edison, New Jersey-based company were down 26 percent at $2.20 in early trade. They touched a more than three-month low of $2.10 earlier in the session. The stock was the top loser on the Nasdaq.

StreetBeat Disclaimer

Distributed by Viestly

Thursday, December 1, 2011

Ahead of the Bell: Yahoo Up On Takeover Talk

Ahead of the Bell: Yahoo Up On Takeover TalkOrlando, FL 12/1/11 (StreetBeat) --Yahoo (Nasdaq:YHOO) jumped more than 5 percent in premarket trading Thursday after further reports that private-equity companies are looking to buy the company, or at least take a major stake.

Late Wednesday, Reuters and Bloomberg News said Blackstone Group and Bain Capital are looking at a joint bid with Alibaba Group of China and Softbank Corp. of Japan. The companies could bid more than $20 per share, the reports said. Neither Yahoo, nor the private capital firms, would comment on the reports.

Others reported to be interested in at least buying a major stake in Yahoo Inc. include Silver Lake Partners, Providence Equity Partners and Kohlberg Kravis Roberts & Co.

Microsoft Corp. (Nasdaq:MSFT) also has signed a confidentiality agreement to gain access to Yahoo's books, but the world's largest software maker doesn't appear to be in interested in buying the entire company like it was in 2008.

Youssef Squali at Jefferies & Co. said he believes a likely scenario is the sale of a Yahoo stake just under 20 percent, avoiding a shareholder voting requirement under Delaware law. The goal would be to set the company up for a tender offer to buy 50 percent control.

The stock rose 5.5 percent, or 86 cents, to $16.56 before the market opened in electronic trading.

StreetBeat Disclaimer

Distributed by Viestly